"Obama reportedly told members of the Obama Alumni Association that 'There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.'... [But] former Attorney General Eric Holder... moved to dismiss such a case based on prosecutorial errors in front of the very same judge, Judge Emmet Sullivan.... The Obama statement is curious on various levels. First... Flynn was never charged with perjury... Second, there is ample precedent for this motion... Third, there is also case law.... Fourth, there are cases where the Department has moved to dismiss cases on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct or other grounds touching on due process, ethical requirements or other concerns.... The rare statement by President Obama is also interesting in light of the new evidence... that Obama was following the investigation of Flynn who he previously dismissed from a high-level position and personally intervened with President Donald Trump to seek to block his appointment as National Security Adviser. Obama reportedly discussed the use of the Logan Act against Flynn. For a person concerned with precedent, that was also a curious focus. The Logan Act is widely viewed as unconstitutional and has never been used to successfully convicted a single person since the early days of the Republic. Now that is dubious precedent."
Writes Jonathan Turley.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Remember when your parents told you- 'Don't be with the in-crowd... Don't follow the crowd?' Well, if you're into making...
-
Landscape with a Carriage and a Train , Vincent van Gogh, 1890 Yesterday, I wrote about contemporary paintings of the open road . These woul...
-
"... not because I think it has found the magic balance — it is way too soon to tell — but because I think we should be debating all th...
No comments:
Post a Comment